Malaysia vs Norway: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Malaysia
- Norway
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 438.62 billion constant 2015 US$ against 422.33 billion constant 2015 US$ in Norway, a difference of 16.29 billion constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Norway ahead.
Malaysia ranks 30th and Norway ranks 31st of 192 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 328.42 billion constant 2015 US$ | 370.16 billion constant 2015 US$ | 41.74 billion constant 2015 US$ | Norway |
| 2020s | 388.39 billion constant 2015 US$ | 405.22 billion constant 2015 US$ | 16.83 billion constant 2015 US$ | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Malaysia or Norway?
- Malaysia, at 438.62 billion constant 2015 US$ against 422.33 billion constant 2015 US$ in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Malaysia and Norway?
- 16.29 billion constant 2015 US$, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Norway?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and Norway rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Malaysia ranks 30th and Norway ranks 31st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.