Ghana vs Turkmenistan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Ghana
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 75.24 billion constant 2015 US$ against 72.97 billion constant 2015 US$ in Ghana, a difference of 2.26 billion constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 72nd and Turkmenistan ranks 69th of 194 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.92 billion constant 2015 US$ | 32.03 billion constant 2015 US$ | 12.89 billion constant 2015 US$ | Ghana |
| 2020s | 64.81 billion constant 2015 US$ | 58.08 billion constant 2015 US$ | 6.72 billion constant 2015 US$ | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Ghana or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 75.24 billion constant 2015 US$ against 72.97 billion constant 2015 US$ in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Ghana and Turkmenistan?
- 2.26 billion constant 2015 US$, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Turkmenistan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Turkmenistan rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Ghana ranks 72nd and Turkmenistan ranks 69th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.