Early-demographic dividend vs Japan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)

Early-demographic dividend
13.72 trillion constant 2015 US$
in 2025
Japan
4.72 trillion constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Early-demographic dividend rank
3rd
Japan rank
1st

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Japan
2.5T5.0T7.5T10.0T12.5T196819962025

How they compare

Early-demographic dividend currently reports 13.72 trillion constant 2015 US$ against 4.72 trillion constant 2015 US$ in Japan, a difference of 9.00 trillion constant 2015 US$.

That makes Early-demographic dividend's figure about 2.9 times Japan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 3rd and Japan ranks 1st of 32 groups.

Early-demographic dividend has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Japan Difference Ahead
1970s 2.36 trillion constant 2015 US$ 1.91 trillion constant 2015 US$ 445.19 billion constant 2015 US$ Early-demographic dividend
1980s 3.14 trillion constant 2015 US$ 2.82 trillion constant 2015 US$ 324.60 billion constant 2015 US$ Early-demographic dividend
1990s 4.23 trillion constant 2015 US$ 3.84 trillion constant 2015 US$ 381.50 billion constant 2015 US$ Early-demographic dividend
2000s 6.20 trillion constant 2015 US$ 4.22 trillion constant 2015 US$ 1.98 trillion constant 2015 US$ Early-demographic dividend
2010s 9.45 trillion constant 2015 US$ 4.46 trillion constant 2015 US$ 4.98 trillion constant 2015 US$ Early-demographic dividend
2020s 12.02 trillion constant 2015 US$ 4.65 trillion constant 2015 US$ 7.37 trillion constant 2015 US$ Early-demographic dividend

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Early-demographic dividend or Japan?
Early-demographic dividend, at 13.72 trillion constant 2015 US$ against 4.72 trillion constant 2015 US$ in Japan as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Early-demographic dividend and Japan?
9.00 trillion constant 2015 US$, with Early-demographic dividend ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Japan?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Japan rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 3rd and Japan ranks 1st of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Japan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us/early-demographic-dividend/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us/early-demographic-dividend/japan/">Early-demographic dividend vs Japan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
227 places, 9,771 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.