Cuba vs Sri Lanka: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Cuba
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 89.77 billion constant 2015 US$ against 80.71 billion constant 2015 US$ in Cuba, a difference of 9.07 billion constant 2015 US$.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 65th of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 83.89 billion constant 2015 US$ | 75.94 billion constant 2015 US$ | 7.95 billion constant 2015 US$ | Cuba |
| 2020s | 81.48 billion constant 2015 US$ | 85.96 billion constant 2015 US$ | 4.48 billion constant 2015 US$ | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Cuba or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 89.77 billion constant 2015 US$ against 80.71 billion constant 2015 US$ in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Cuba and Sri Lanka?
- 9.07 billion constant 2015 US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Sri Lanka rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Cuba ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 65th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.