Aruba vs Greenland: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Aruba
- Greenland
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 2.86 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.82 billion constant 2015 US$ in Greenland, a difference of 35.76 million constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 164th and Greenland ranks 165th of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.75 billion constant 2015 US$ | 2.52 billion constant 2015 US$ | 233.19 million constant 2015 US$ | Aruba |
| 2020s | 2.58 billion constant 2015 US$ | 2.76 billion constant 2015 US$ | 187.58 million constant 2015 US$ | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Aruba or Greenland?
- Aruba, at 2.86 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.82 billion constant 2015 US$ in Greenland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Aruba and Greenland?
- 35.76 million constant 2015 US$, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Greenland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Greenland rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Aruba ranks 164th and Greenland ranks 165th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.