Aruba vs Bhutan: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA)
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) over time
- Aruba
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 2.87 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.86 billion constant 2015 US$ in Aruba, a difference of 7.47 million constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 164th and Bhutan ranks 163rd of 192 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.75 billion constant 2015 US$ | 2.17 billion constant 2015 US$ | 578.63 million constant 2015 US$ | Aruba |
| 2020s | 2.58 billion constant 2015 US$ | 2.50 billion constant 2015 US$ | 80.13 million constant 2015 US$ | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva), Aruba or Bhutan?
- Bhutan, at 2.87 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.86 billion constant 2015 US$ in Aruba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) between Aruba and Bhutan?
- 7.47 million constant 2015 US$, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Bhutan?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Bhutan rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva)?
- Aruba ranks 164th and Bhutan ranks 163rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross value added at basic prices reflects the price of products receivable by the producer exclusive of taxes payable on products and inclusive of subsidies receivable on products, less intermediate consumption valued at purchasers' prices. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.