Pakistan vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit

Pakistan
0.984 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Zambia
0.9945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Pakistan rank
17th
Zambia rank
16th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit over time

  • Pakistan
  • Zambia
0246196019922025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.9945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.984 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0105 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zambia ahead.

Pakistan ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 16th of 193 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 3.87 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 3.58 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.295 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan
1970s 3.67 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.45 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.22 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan
1980s 2.35 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.13 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2183 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan
1990s 2.28 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.89 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3926 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2000s 1.41 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.4 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0119 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2010s 1.02 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8194 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2005 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan
2020s 1.05 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0182 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit, Pakistan or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.9945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.984 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit between Pakistan and Zambia?
0.0105 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Zambia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Pakistan and Zambia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit?
Pakistan ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 16th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pakistan/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/pakistan/zambia/">Pakistan vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,725 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.