Norway vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit

Norway
0.7957 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.8059 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Norway rank
61st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
58th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit over time

  • Norway
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
02468197019972025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.8059 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7957 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Norway, a difference of 0.0102 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Norway ranks 61st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 58th of 193 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 1.65 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.71 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0655 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 1.13 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.25 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1182 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.7814 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9136 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1322 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.8088 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8347 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0259 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit, Norway or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.8059 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7957 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Norway as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit between Norway and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0102 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Tanzania, United Republic of?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Norway and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit?
Norway ranks 61st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 58th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/norway/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/norway/tanzania/">Norway vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,725 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.