Least developed countries vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit

Least developed countries
0.7802 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Zambia
0.9945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Least developed countries rank
19th
Zambia rank
16th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Zambia
12345196519952025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.9945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7802 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries, a difference of 0.2143 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zambia ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 16th of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Least developed countries averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.8 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.89 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0843 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
2000s 1.49 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.4 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0832 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Least developed countries
2010s 0.929 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8194 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1097 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Least developed countries
2020s 0.8199 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2154 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit, Least developed countries or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.9945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7802 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Least developed countries as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit between Least developed countries and Zambia?
0.2143 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Zambia?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Least developed countries and Zambia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit?
Least developed countries ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 16th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/least-developed-countries-un-classification/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/least-developed-countries-un-classification/zambia/">Least developed countries vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,725 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.