Japan vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit

Japan
1.13 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.9096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Japan rank
11th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
8th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit over time

  • Japan
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
0246197019972025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 1.13 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.2204 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Japan ahead.

Japan ranks 11th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 193 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Sub-Saharan Africa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1980s 1.62 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.73 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1103 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sub-Saharan Africa
1990s 0.874 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.51 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6389 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 0.8843 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.35 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.4671 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 0.8408 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8915 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0507 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 1 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8685 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1332 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit, Japan or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Japan, at 1.13 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.9096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit between Japan and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.2204 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Sub-Saharan Africa?
44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
How do Japan and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit?
Japan ranks 11th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 8th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Japan vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/japan/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/japan/sub-saharan-africa/">Japan vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,725 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.