Central Europe and the Baltics vs Macau, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit

Central Europe and the Baltics
0.547 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Macau, China
0.89 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
32nd
Macau, China rank
30th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Macau, China
0.50.7511.21.51.8199520102025

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 0.89 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.547 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 0.343 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 32nd and Macau, China ranks 30th of 32 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Macau, China Difference Ahead
2000s 0.7251 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.38 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6547 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Macau, China
2010s 0.7948 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.07 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2791 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Macau, China
2020s 0.6948 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9215 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2267 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit, Central Europe and the Baltics or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 0.89 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.547 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit between Central Europe and the Baltics and Macau, China?
0.343 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Macau, China?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Macau, China rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 32nd and Macau, China ranks 30th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Macau, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/central-europe-and-the-baltics/macao-sar-china/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Macau, China: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,725 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.