Arab World vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit

Arab World
0.8317 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Zambia
0.9945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Arab World rank
16th
Zambia rank
16th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit over time

  • Arab World
  • Zambia
12345196519952025

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.9945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8317 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Arab World, a difference of 0.1628 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Arab World's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Arab World ahead.

Arab World ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 16th of 32 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Arab World averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Arab World Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 2.77 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.12 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.6559 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Arab World
1980s 1.87 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 2.13 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2648 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia
1990s 2 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.89 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1112 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Arab World
2000s 1.51 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.4 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1058 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Arab World
2010s 0.9309 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8194 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1115 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Arab World
2020s 0.8599 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.04 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1754 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit, Arab World or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.9945 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.8317 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Arab World as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit between Arab World and Zambia?
0.1628 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Arab World and Zambia?
50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
How do Arab World and Zambia rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit?
Arab World ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 16th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Arab World vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/arab-world/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/arab-world/zambia/">Arab World vs Zambia: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,725 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.