Angola vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit

Angola
0.9153 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.7281 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Angola rank
26th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
27th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit over time

  • Angola
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.511.522.5199020072025

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.9153 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7281 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.1872 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.3 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 26th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th of 193 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
2000s 1.34 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 1.26 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0757 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Angola
2010s 0.9478 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.9026 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0451 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Angola
2020s 1.08 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.8059 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2777 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit, Angola or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Angola, at 0.9153 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.7281 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit between Angola and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
0.1872 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2025.
How do Angola and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per unit?
Angola ranks 26th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 27th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Angola vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,725 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.