New Zealand vs Pre-demographic dividend: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per

New Zealand
37,966 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2024
Pre-demographic dividend
1,393 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
New Zealand rank
29th
Pre-demographic dividend rank
27th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per over time

  • New Zealand
  • Pre-demographic dividend
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197720012025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 37,966 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,393 constant 2015 US$ per person in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 36,573 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 27.3 times Pre-demographic dividend's.

Across all 44 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 29th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 27th of 193 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Pre-demographic dividend Difference Ahead
1980s 23,545 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,022 constant 2015 US$ per person 22,523 constant 2015 US$ per person New Zealand
1990s 25,273 constant 2015 US$ per person 954.78 constant 2015 US$ per person 24,318 constant 2015 US$ per person New Zealand
2000s 31,359 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,145 constant 2015 US$ per person 30,215 constant 2015 US$ per person New Zealand
2010s 34,992 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,432 constant 2015 US$ per person 33,559 constant 2015 US$ per person New Zealand
2020s 38,031 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,364 constant 2015 US$ per person 36,667 constant 2015 US$ per person New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per, New Zealand or Pre-demographic dividend?
New Zealand, at 37,966 constant 2015 US$ per person against 1,393 constant 2015 US$ per person in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per between New Zealand and Pre-demographic dividend?
36,573 constant 2015 US$ per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Pre-demographic dividend?
44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), per?
New Zealand ranks 29th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 27th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Pre-demographic dividend: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-capita/new-zealand/pre-demographic-dividend/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-per-capita/new-zealand/pre-demographic-dividend/">New Zealand vs Pre-demographic dividend: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,771 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.