Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Libya: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), annual

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
6.25 % change on previous year
in 2025
Libya
13.3 % change on previous year
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
4th
Libya rank
4th

Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), annual over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Libya
-50050100199120082025

How they compare

Libya currently reports 13.3 % change on previous year against 6.25 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 7.05 % change on previous year.

That makes Libya's figure about 2.1 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Libya ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 4th and Libya ranks 4th of 32 groups.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Libya Difference Ahead
2000s 5.19 % change on previous year 0.5166 % change on previous year 4.67 % change on previous year Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2010s 4.75 % change on previous year 2.14 % change on previous year 2.61 % change on previous year Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 4.02 % change on previous year 2.34 % change on previous year 1.67 % change on previous year Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), annual, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Libya?
Libya, at 13.3 % change on previous year against 6.25 % change on previous year in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), annual between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Libya?
7.05 % change on previous year, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Libya?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Libya rank globally for gross value added at basic prices (gva) (constant 2015 us$), annual?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 4th and Libya ranks 4th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Libya: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-value-added-at-basic-prices-gva-constant-2015-us-annual-growth-rate/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/libya/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Libya: Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
227 places, 9,544 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Gross value added at basic prices (GVA) (constant 2015 US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.