Curaçao vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings
Gross savings over time
- Curaçao
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 10.7% against 10.6% in Curaçao, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Curaçao ahead.
Curaçao ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 178 countries.
Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings, Curaçao or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 10.7% against 10.6% in Curaçao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross savings between Curaçao and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
- How do Curaçao and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross savings?
- Curaçao ranks 160th and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross savings (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savings is an amount that represents the part of disposable income (adjusted for the change in pension entitlements) that is not spent on final consumption. Gross savings are calculated as gross national income less total consumption, plus net transfers. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.