Palau vs East Timor: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Palau
-77,961 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
-11,867 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Palau rank
175th
East Timor rank
174th

Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Palau
  • East Timor
-100.0k0100.0k200.0k200520142023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports -11,867 current US$ per square kilometre against -77,961 current US$ per square kilometre in Palau, a difference of 66,094 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was East Timor ahead.

Palau ranks 175th and East Timor ranks 174th of 176 countries.

East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palau East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 10,526 current US$ per square kilometre 99,988 current US$ per square kilometre 89,462 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 22,052 current US$ per square kilometre 105,538 current US$ per square kilometre 83,486 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor
2020s -36,109 current US$ per square kilometre 43,289 current US$ per square kilometre 79,398 current US$ per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Palau or East Timor?
East Timor, at -11,867 current US$ per square kilometre against -77,961 current US$ per square kilometre in Palau as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Palau and East Timor?
66,094 current US$ per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and East Timor?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Palau and East Timor rank globally for gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Palau ranks 175th and East Timor ranks 174th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Palau vs East Timor: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/palau/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/palau/timor-leste/">Palau vs East Timor: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.