Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Congo
13,743 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Guinea-Bissau
13,541 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
142nd
Guinea-Bissau rank
145th

Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Guinea-Bissau
010.0k20.0k30.0k197820002023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 13,743 current US$ per square kilometre against 13,541 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 202 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 142nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th of 176 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 4 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1980s 1,615 current US$ per square kilometre -505.07 current US$ per square kilometre 2,120 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
1990s 1,302 current US$ per square kilometre 590.4 current US$ per square kilometre 711.66 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2000s 6,725 current US$ per square kilometre 1,684 current US$ per square kilometre 5,042 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 21,430 current US$ per square kilometre 5,094 current US$ per square kilometre 16,337 current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 12,966 current US$ per square kilometre 14,101 current US$ per square kilometre 1,135 current US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
Congo, at 13,743 current US$ per square kilometre against 13,541 current US$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2021.
What is the difference in gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
202 current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
35 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2021.
How do Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 142nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 145th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/guinea-bissau/">Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.