What is the difference in gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and New Caledonia?

1,206 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Caledonia?

15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs New Caledonia: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Chile

91,071 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

New Caledonia

92,277 current US$ per square kilometre

in 2016

Chile rank

93rd

New Caledonia rank

91st

Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

Chile
New Caledonia

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 92,277 current US$ per square kilometre against 91,071 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 1,206 current US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 15 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 93rd and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 176 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	44,415 current US$ per square kilometre	92,673 current US$ per square kilometre	48,258 current US$ per square kilometre	New Caledonia
2010s	76,857 current US$ per square kilometre	113,849 current US$ per square kilometre	36,992 current US$ per square kilometre	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or New Caledonia?: New Caledonia, at 92,277 current US$ per square kilometre against 91,071 current US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2016.
What is the difference in gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and New Caledonia?: 1,206 current US$ per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Caledonia?: 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
How do Chile and New Caledonia rank globally for gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?: Chile ranks 93rd and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Caledonia: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/new-caledonia/">Chile vs New Caledonia: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.