Chile vs Georgia: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Chile
91,071 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia
86,071 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
93rd
Georgia rank
94th

Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Georgia
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k197519992023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 91,071 current US$ per square kilometre against 86,071 current US$ per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 5,000 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 93rd and Georgia ranks 94th of 176 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 25,856 current US$ per square kilometre 4,990 current US$ per square kilometre 20,866 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 40,112 current US$ per square kilometre 10,038 current US$ per square kilometre 30,074 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 76,370 current US$ per square kilometre 38,315 current US$ per square kilometre 38,055 current US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 73,873 current US$ per square kilometre 53,161 current US$ per square kilometre 20,712 current US$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Chile or Georgia?
Chile, at 91,071 current US$ per square kilometre against 86,071 current US$ per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Chile and Georgia?
5,000 current US$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 93rd and Georgia ranks 94th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Georgia: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/georgia/">Chile vs Georgia: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.