Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
10,086 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
11,195 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
151st
Zimbabwe rank
149th

Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
-5.0k05.0k10.0k15.0k197720002023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 11,195 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,086 current US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 1,109 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 176 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 3,970 current US$ per square kilometre -462.39 current US$ per square kilometre 4,432 current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s 7,462 current US$ per square kilometre 2,987 current US$ per square kilometre 4,476 current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 10,345 current US$ per square kilometre 9,695 current US$ per square kilometre 650.19 current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 11,195 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,086 current US$ per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
1,109 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.