Bermuda vs Hong Kong: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre

Bermuda
69.17 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong
89.09 million current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda rank
4th
Hong Kong rank
3rd

Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bermuda
  • Hong Kong
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M199820102023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 89.09 million current US$ per square kilometre against 69.17 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda, a difference of 19.92 million current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.3 times Bermuda's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Bermuda ranks 4th and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 176 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Hong Kong Difference Ahead
2010s 49.19 million current US$ per square kilometre 75.11 million current US$ per square kilometre 25.92 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 58.45 million current US$ per square kilometre 90.44 million current US$ per square kilometre 31.99 million current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre, Bermuda or Hong Kong?
Hong Kong, at 89.09 million current US$ per square kilometre against 69.17 million current US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre between Bermuda and Hong Kong?
19.92 million current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Hong Kong?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Bermuda and Hong Kong rank globally for gross savings (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bermuda ranks 4th and Hong Kong ranks 3rd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Hong Kong: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/hong-kong-sar-china/">Bermuda vs Hong Kong: Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.