Rwanda vs Tunisia: Gross savings (current US$), per capita
Rwanda
241.43 current US$ per person
in 2024
Tunisia
229.88 current US$ per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
150th
Tunisia rank
152nd
Gross savings (current US$), per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Tunisia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 241.43 current US$ per person against 229.88 current US$ per person in Tunisia, a difference of 11.55 current US$ per person.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Tunisia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 150th and Tunisia ranks 152nd of 178 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 103.47 current US$ per person | 580.3 current US$ per person | 476.83 current US$ per person | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 207.23 current US$ per person | 241.99 current US$ per person | 34.76 current US$ per person | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current us$), per capita, Rwanda or Tunisia?
- Rwanda, at 241.43 current US$ per person against 229.88 current US$ per person in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current us$), per capita between Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 11.55 current US$ per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tunisia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Tunisia rank globally for gross savings (current us$), per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 150th and Tunisia ranks 152nd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.