Hungary vs New Caledonia: Gross savings (current US$), per capita
Hungary
6,175 current US$ per person
in 2025
New Caledonia
5,952 current US$ per person
in 2016
Hungary rank
43rd
New Caledonia rank
44th
Gross savings (current US$), per capita over time
- Hungary
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 6,175 current US$ per person against 5,952 current US$ per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 223 current US$ per person.
Across all 15 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 43rd and New Caledonia ranks 44th of 178 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,995 current US$ per person | 6,846 current US$ per person | 4,851 current US$ per person | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 3,185 current US$ per person | 7,602 current US$ per person | 4,417 current US$ per person | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current us$), per capita, Hungary or New Caledonia?
- Hungary, at 6,175 current US$ per person against 5,952 current US$ per person in New Caledonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current us$), per capita between Hungary and New Caledonia?
- 223 current US$ per person, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and New Caledonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Hungary and New Caledonia rank globally for gross savings (current us$), per capita?
- Hungary ranks 43rd and New Caledonia ranks 44th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.