China vs New Caledonia: Gross savings (current US$), per capita
China
5,678 current US$ per person
in 2024
New Caledonia
5,952 current US$ per person
in 2016
China rank
45th
New Caledonia rank
44th
Gross savings (current US$), per capita over time
- China
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 5,952 current US$ per person against 5,678 current US$ per person in China, a difference of 274 current US$ per person.
Across all 15 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
China ranks 45th and New Caledonia ranks 44th of 178 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,079 current US$ per person | 6,846 current US$ per person | 5,767 current US$ per person | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 3,223 current US$ per person | 7,602 current US$ per person | 4,379 current US$ per person | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current us$), per capita, China or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 5,952 current US$ per person against 5,678 current US$ per person in China as of 2016.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current us$), per capita between China and New Caledonia?
- 274 current US$ per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and New Caledonia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do China and New Caledonia rank globally for gross savings (current us$), per capita?
- China ranks 45th and New Caledonia ranks 44th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.