Qatar vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Qatar
2.09 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Zimbabwe
2.12 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Qatar rank
94th
Zimbabwe rank
93rd
Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP over time
- Qatar
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 2.12 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 2.09 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Qatar, a difference of 0.03 current LCU per US$ of GDP.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 178 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.89 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 1.89 current LCU per US$ of GDP | Qatar |
| 2020s | 1.83 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.007 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 1.82 current LCU per US$ of GDP | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp, Qatar or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 2.12 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 2.09 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp between Qatar and Zimbabwe?
- 0.03 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Qatar and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp?
- Qatar ranks 94th and Zimbabwe ranks 93rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.