Namibia vs Qatar: Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Namibia
1.73 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Qatar
2.09 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Namibia rank
97th
Qatar rank
94th
Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP over time
- Namibia
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 2.09 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.73 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0.36 current LCU per US$ of GDP.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Qatar ahead.
Namibia ranks 97th and Qatar ranks 94th of 178 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.65 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 1.89 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.2437 current LCU per US$ of GDP | Qatar |
| 2020s | 1.49 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 1.83 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.337 current LCU per US$ of GDP | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp, Namibia or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 2.09 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.73 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp between Namibia and Qatar?
- 0.36 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Qatar?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Namibia and Qatar rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp?
- Namibia ranks 97th and Qatar ranks 94th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.