Eritrea vs Libya: Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Eritrea
1.52 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2000
Libya
1.24 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Eritrea rank
100th
Libya rank
103rd
Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Libya
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 1.52 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.24 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Libya, a difference of 0.28 current LCU per US$ of GDP.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.2 times Libya's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 100th and Libya ranks 103rd of 178 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.93 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.0657 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 1.87 current LCU per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 1.52 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 0.1659 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 1.36 current LCU per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Libya?
- Eritrea, at 1.52 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 1.24 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Libya as of 2000.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Libya?
- 0.28 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Libya?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2000.
- How do Eritrea and Libya rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 100th and Libya ranks 103rd of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.