Chad vs Comoros: Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP
Chad
74.43 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 1994
Comoros
54.82 current LCU per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Chad rank
37th
Comoros rank
40th
Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP over time
- Chad
- Comoros
How they compare
Chad currently reports 74.43 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 54.82 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Comoros, a difference of 19.61 current LCU per US$ of GDP.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.4 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Comoros ahead.
Chad ranks 37th and Comoros ranks 40th of 178 countries.
Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 30.74 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 43.96 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 13.23 current LCU per US$ of GDP | Comoros |
| 1990s | 26.56 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 36.57 current LCU per US$ of GDP | 10.01 current LCU per US$ of GDP | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp, Chad or Comoros?
- Chad, at 74.43 current LCU per US$ of GDP against 54.82 current LCU per US$ of GDP in Comoros as of 1994.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp between Chad and Comoros?
- 19.61 current LCU per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Comoros?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 1994.
- How do Chad and Comoros rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per unit of gdp?
- Chad ranks 37th and Comoros ranks 40th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.