Saudi Arabia vs United States: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Saudi Arabia
677,944 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
United States
521,005 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Saudi Arabia rank
115th
United States rank
118th

Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • United States
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k197019962023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 677,944 current LCU per square kilometre against 521,005 current LCU per square kilometre in United States, a difference of 156,939 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.3 times United States's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1971 it was United States ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 115th and United States ranks 118th of 176 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 2 and United States in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia United States Difference Ahead
1970s 41,460 current LCU per square kilometre 43,774 current LCU per square kilometre 2,315 current LCU per square kilometre United States
1980s 58,745 current LCU per square kilometre 94,070 current LCU per square kilometre 35,325 current LCU per square kilometre United States
1990s 49,255 current LCU per square kilometre 160,100 current LCU per square kilometre 110,845 current LCU per square kilometre United States
2000s 229,521 current LCU per square kilometre 241,938 current LCU per square kilometre 12,418 current LCU per square kilometre United States
2010s 468,791 current LCU per square kilometre 365,341 current LCU per square kilometre 103,450 current LCU per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2020s 575,924 current LCU per square kilometre 482,784 current LCU per square kilometre 93,140 current LCU per square kilometre Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Saudi Arabia or United States?
Saudi Arabia, at 677,944 current LCU per square kilometre against 521,005 current LCU per square kilometre in United States as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Saudi Arabia and United States?
156,939 current LCU per square kilometre, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and United States?
53 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Saudi Arabia and United States rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Saudi Arabia ranks 115th and United States ranks 118th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saudi Arabia vs United States: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/saudi-arabia/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/saudi-arabia/united-states/">Saudi Arabia vs United States: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.