Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Papua New Guinea
8,499 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2004
Zimbabwe
21,084 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
170th
Zimbabwe rank
167th

Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197619992023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 21,084 current LCU per square kilometre against 8,499 current LCU per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 12,585 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.5 times Papua New Guinea's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 176 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 901.12 current LCU per square kilometre 0.1278 current LCU per square kilometre 901 current LCU per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1980s 760.16 current LCU per square kilometre -0.0085 current LCU per square kilometre 760.17 current LCU per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
1990s 2,189 current LCU per square kilometre -0.363 current LCU per square kilometre 2,189 current LCU per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 21,084 current LCU per square kilometre against 8,499 current LCU per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
12,585 current LCU per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
18 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1994.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Papua New Guinea ranks 170th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.