Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Namibia
32,394 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
21,084 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
164th
Zimbabwe rank
167th

Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197720002023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 32,394 current LCU per square kilometre against 21,084 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 11,310 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 176 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 3,479 current LCU per square kilometre -0.363 current LCU per square kilometre 3,480 current LCU per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 15,294 current LCU per square kilometre -0.185 current LCU per square kilometre 15,295 current LCU per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 24,223 current LCU per square kilometre 4.57 current LCU per square kilometre 24,219 current LCU per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 23,378 current LCU per square kilometre 5,810 current LCU per square kilometre 17,568 current LCU per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
Namibia, at 32,394 current LCU per square kilometre against 21,084 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
11,310 current LCU per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 164th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zimbabwe/">Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.