Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Libya
31,149 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
21,084 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
165th
Zimbabwe rank
167th

Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Libya
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197720002023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 31,149 current LCU per square kilometre against 21,084 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 10,065 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 165th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 176 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 847.64 current LCU per square kilometre -0.363 current LCU per square kilometre 848.01 current LCU per square kilometre Libya
2000s 18,728 current LCU per square kilometre -0.185 current LCU per square kilometre 18,729 current LCU per square kilometre Libya
2010s 13,058 current LCU per square kilometre 4.57 current LCU per square kilometre 13,053 current LCU per square kilometre Libya
2020s 23,964 current LCU per square kilometre 5,810 current LCU per square kilometre 18,154 current LCU per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Libya or Zimbabwe?
Libya, at 31,149 current LCU per square kilometre against 21,084 current LCU per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Libya and Zimbabwe?
10,065 current LCU per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?
20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Libya and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Libya ranks 165th and Zimbabwe ranks 167th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/">Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.