Hong Kong vs Uzbekistan: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Hong Kong
697.55 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Uzbekistan
854.24 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
6th
Uzbekistan rank
5th

Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Uzbekistan
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M199820102023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 854.24 million current LCU per square kilometre against 697.55 million current LCU per square kilometre in Hong Kong, a difference of 156.68 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 6th and Uzbekistan ranks 5th of 176 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 514.42 million current LCU per square kilometre 28.11 million current LCU per square kilometre 486.31 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 584.58 million current LCU per square kilometre 176.41 million current LCU per square kilometre 408.16 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 705.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 672.76 million current LCU per square kilometre 32.42 million current LCU per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Hong Kong or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 854.24 million current LCU per square kilometre against 697.55 million current LCU per square kilometre in Hong Kong as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Hong Kong and Uzbekistan?
156.68 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Uzbekistan?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Uzbekistan rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong ranks 6th and Uzbekistan ranks 5th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Uzbekistan: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/uzbekistan/">Hong Kong vs Uzbekistan: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.