Ecuador vs Latvia: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Ecuador
109,392 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
132,686 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
151st
Latvia rank
148th

Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Latvia
050.0k100.0k150.0k197619992023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 132,686 current LCU per square kilometre against 109,392 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 23,294 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 151st and Latvia ranks 148th of 176 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 15,909 current LCU per square kilometre 11,404 current LCU per square kilometre 4,505 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 38,119 current LCU per square kilometre 50,214 current LCU per square kilometre 12,095 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 90,593 current LCU per square kilometre 88,773 current LCU per square kilometre 1,819 current LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 100,457 current LCU per square kilometre 118,646 current LCU per square kilometre 18,188 current LCU per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Latvia?
Latvia, at 132,686 current LCU per square kilometre against 109,392 current LCU per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Latvia?
23,294 current LCU per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 151st and Latvia ranks 148th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Latvia: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/latvia/">Ecuador vs Latvia: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.