Chile vs Tanzania: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Chile
76.51 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
76.87 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
23rd
Tanzania rank
22nd
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time
- Chile
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 76.87 million current LCU per square kilometre against 76.51 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 363,500 current LCU per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 23rd and Tanzania ranks 22nd of 176 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.23 million current LCU per square kilometre | 1.47 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.77 million current LCU per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2000s | 22.71 million current LCU per square kilometre | 6.19 million current LCU per square kilometre | 16.52 million current LCU per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2010s | 44.61 million current LCU per square kilometre | 28.65 million current LCU per square kilometre | 15.96 million current LCU per square kilometre | Chile |
| 2020s | 60.41 million current LCU per square kilometre | 69.40 million current LCU per square kilometre | 8.99 million current LCU per square kilometre | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Chile or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 76.87 million current LCU per square kilometre against 76.51 million current LCU per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Chile and Tanzania?
- 363,500 current LCU per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tanzania?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Tanzania rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 23rd and Tanzania ranks 22nd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.