Cameroon vs Iceland: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Cameroon
9.36 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
10.50 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
61st
Iceland rank
58th

Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • Iceland
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M197619992023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 10.50 million current LCU per square kilometre against 9.36 million current LCU per square kilometre in Cameroon, a difference of 1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 61st and Iceland ranks 58th of 176 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 5 and Iceland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 243,558 current LCU per square kilometre 19,459 current LCU per square kilometre 224,098 current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
1980s 1.28 million current LCU per square kilometre 255,542 current LCU per square kilometre 1.03 million current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 1.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 873,187 current LCU per square kilometre 920,082 current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 3.46 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.44 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.02 million current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 5.97 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 844,794 current LCU per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 8.12 million current LCU per square kilometre 8.19 million current LCU per square kilometre 74,735 current LCU per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Cameroon or Iceland?
Iceland, at 10.50 million current LCU per square kilometre against 9.36 million current LCU per square kilometre in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Cameroon and Iceland?
1.14 million current LCU per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Iceland?
46 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Iceland rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 61st and Iceland ranks 58th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Iceland: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/iceland/">Cameroon vs Iceland: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.