Australia vs Kiribati: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Australia
79,653 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
91,270 current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
154th
Kiribati rank
152nd

Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Kiribati
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k198920062023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 91,270 current LCU per square kilometre against 79,653 current LCU per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 11,617 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 154th and Kiribati ranks 152nd of 176 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Kiribati in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 32,870 current LCU per square kilometre 15,962 current LCU per square kilometre 16,908 current LCU per square kilometre Australia
2010s 47,320 current LCU per square kilometre 129,676 current LCU per square kilometre 82,356 current LCU per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 70,987 current LCU per square kilometre 108,003 current LCU per square kilometre 37,016 current LCU per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Australia or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 91,270 current LCU per square kilometre against 79,653 current LCU per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Australia and Kiribati?
11,617 current LCU per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kiribati rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 154th and Kiribati ranks 152nd of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kiribati: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/kiribati/">Australia vs Kiribati: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.