Aruba vs Norway: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Aruba
5.17 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
5.41 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
72nd
Norway rank
71st

Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Norway
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M197519992023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 5.41 million current LCU per square kilometre against 5.17 million current LCU per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 239,230 current LCU per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 72nd and Norway ranks 71st of 176 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 3.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 890,364 current LCU per square kilometre 2.95 million current LCU per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 2.80 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 864,914 current LCU per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 2.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.85 million current LCU per square kilometre 57,709 current LCU per square kilometre Norway
2020s 3.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 4.94 million current LCU per square kilometre 1.57 million current LCU per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Aruba or Norway?
Norway, at 5.41 million current LCU per square kilometre against 5.17 million current LCU per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Aruba and Norway?
239,230 current LCU per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Norway?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Norway rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 72nd and Norway ranks 71st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Norway: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/norway/">Aruba vs Norway: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.