Aruba vs China: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre

Aruba
5.17 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
China
5.87 million current LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
72nd
China rank
69th

Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • China
02.0M4.0M6.0M198220022023

How they compare

China currently reports 5.87 million current LCU per square kilometre against 5.17 million current LCU per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 696,780 current LCU per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 72nd and China ranks 69th of 176 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba China Difference Ahead
1990s 3.84 million current LCU per square kilometre 319,336 current LCU per square kilometre 3.52 million current LCU per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 2.80 million current LCU per square kilometre 991,697 current LCU per square kilometre 1.81 million current LCU per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 2.79 million current LCU per square kilometre 3.39 million current LCU per square kilometre 598,517 current LCU per square kilometre China
2020s 3.37 million current LCU per square kilometre 5.54 million current LCU per square kilometre 2.16 million current LCU per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre, Aruba or China?
China, at 5.87 million current LCU per square kilometre against 5.17 million current LCU per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre between Aruba and China?
696,780 current LCU per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and China?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Aruba and China rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 72nd and China ranks 69th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs China: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-savings-current-lcu-per-square-kilometre/aruba/china/">Aruba vs China: Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross savings (current LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
current LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 6,153 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.