Rwanda vs Serbia: Gross savings (current LCU), per capita
Rwanda
318,240 current LCU per person
in 2024
Serbia
300,963 current LCU per person
in 2025
Rwanda rank
34th
Serbia rank
36th
Gross savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Serbia
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 318,240 current LCU per person against 300,963 current LCU per person in Serbia, a difference of 17,277 current LCU per person.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Rwanda ranks 34th and Serbia ranks 36th of 178 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 76,250 current LCU per person | 95,550 current LCU per person | 19,300 current LCU per person | Serbia |
| 2020s | 230,237 current LCU per person | 242,481 current LCU per person | 12,244 current LCU per person | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per capita, Rwanda or Serbia?
- Rwanda, at 318,240 current LCU per person against 300,963 current LCU per person in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per capita between Rwanda and Serbia?
- 17,277 current LCU per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 34th and Serbia ranks 36th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.