Malawi vs East Timor: Gross savings (current LCU), per capita
Malawi
-18,060 current LCU per person
in 2024
East Timor
-281.42 current LCU per person
in 2024
Malawi rank
177th
East Timor rank
174th
Gross savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Malawi
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports -281.42 current LCU per person against -18,060 current LCU per person in Malawi, a difference of 17,779 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 177th and East Timor ranks 174th of 178 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23,914 current LCU per person | 377.91 current LCU per person | 23,536 current LCU per person | Malawi |
| 2020s | -4,302 current LCU per person | 325.4 current LCU per person | 4,627 current LCU per person | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per capita, Malawi or East Timor?
- East Timor, at -281.42 current LCU per person against -18,060 current LCU per person in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per capita between Malawi and East Timor?
- 17,779 current LCU per person, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and East Timor?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and East Timor rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Malawi ranks 177th and East Timor ranks 174th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.