Latvia vs Samoa: Gross savings (current LCU), per capita
Latvia
4,822 current LCU per person
in 2025
Samoa
4,909 current LCU per person
in 2025
Latvia rank
141st
Samoa rank
140th
Gross savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Latvia
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 4,909 current LCU per person against 4,822 current LCU per person in Latvia, a difference of 87 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 141st and Samoa ranks 140th of 178 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,697 current LCU per person | 2,328 current LCU per person | 368.49 current LCU per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 2,788 current LCU per person | 3,168 current LCU per person | 380.17 current LCU per person | Samoa |
| 2020s | 4,109 current LCU per person | 3,645 current LCU per person | 463.52 current LCU per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per capita, Latvia or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 4,909 current LCU per person against 4,822 current LCU per person in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per capita between Latvia and Samoa?
- 87 current LCU per person, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Samoa?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Samoa rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Latvia ranks 141st and Samoa ranks 140th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.