Jordan vs Palestine: Gross savings (current LCU), per capita
Jordan
228.12 current LCU per person
in 2007
Palestine
291.42 current LCU per person
in 2025
Jordan rank
171st
Palestine rank
170th
Gross savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Jordan
- Palestine
How they compare
Palestine currently reports 291.42 current LCU per person against 228.12 current LCU per person in Jordan, a difference of 63.3 current LCU per person.
That makes Palestine's figure about 1.3 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 171st and Palestine ranks 170th of 178 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 268.3 current LCU per person | 109.22 current LCU per person | 159.08 current LCU per person | Jordan |
| 2000s | 292.16 current LCU per person | 80.58 current LCU per person | 211.58 current LCU per person | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per capita, Jordan or Palestine?
- Palestine, at 291.42 current LCU per person against 228.12 current LCU per person in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per capita between Jordan and Palestine?
- 63.3 current LCU per person, with Palestine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Palestine?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2007.
- How do Jordan and Palestine rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Jordan ranks 171st and Palestine ranks 170th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.