Guatemala vs Zambia: Gross savings (current LCU), per capita
Guatemala
9,219 current LCU per person
in 2024
Zambia
9,989 current LCU per person
in 2024
Guatemala rank
117th
Zambia rank
115th
Gross savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Guatemala
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 9,989 current LCU per person against 9,219 current LCU per person in Guatemala, a difference of 770 current LCU per person.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 117th and Zambia ranks 115th of 178 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,876 current LCU per person | 4,450 current LCU per person | 574.34 current LCU per person | Zambia |
| 2020s | 7,803 current LCU per person | 9,728 current LCU per person | 1,925 current LCU per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per capita, Guatemala or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 9,989 current LCU per person against 9,219 current LCU per person in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per capita between Guatemala and Zambia?
- 770 current LCU per person, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Zambia rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Guatemala ranks 117th and Zambia ranks 115th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.