Eritrea vs Tunisia: Gross savings (current LCU), per capita
Eritrea
478.69 current LCU per person
in 2000
Tunisia
714.35 current LCU per person
in 2024
Eritrea rank
169th
Tunisia rank
166th
Gross savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Eritrea
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 714.35 current LCU per person against 478.69 current LCU per person in Eritrea, a difference of 235.66 current LCU per person.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.5 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 169th and Tunisia ranks 166th of 178 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 556.51 current LCU per person | 452.62 current LCU per person | 103.89 current LCU per person | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 478.69 current LCU per person | 668.3 current LCU per person | 189.61 current LCU per person | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per capita, Eritrea or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 714.35 current LCU per person against 478.69 current LCU per person in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per capita between Eritrea and Tunisia?
- 235.66 current LCU per person, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Tunisia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2000.
- How do Eritrea and Tunisia rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Eritrea ranks 169th and Tunisia ranks 166th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.