Eritrea vs Jordan: Gross savings (current LCU), per capita
Eritrea
478.69 current LCU per person
in 2000
Jordan
228.12 current LCU per person
in 2007
Eritrea rank
169th
Jordan rank
171st
Gross savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Eritrea
- Jordan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 478.69 current LCU per person against 228.12 current LCU per person in Jordan, a difference of 250.57 current LCU per person.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 2.1 times Jordan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 169th and Jordan ranks 171st of 178 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 556.51 current LCU per person | 245.04 current LCU per person | 311.47 current LCU per person | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 478.69 current LCU per person | 252.63 current LCU per person | 226.06 current LCU per person | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per capita, Eritrea or Jordan?
- Eritrea, at 478.69 current LCU per person against 228.12 current LCU per person in Jordan as of 2000.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per capita between Eritrea and Jordan?
- 250.57 current LCU per person, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Jordan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2000.
- How do Eritrea and Jordan rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Eritrea ranks 169th and Jordan ranks 171st of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.