Chad vs Morocco: Gross savings (current LCU), per capita
Chad
12,945 current LCU per person
in 1994
Morocco
13,038 current LCU per person
in 2025
Chad rank
107th
Morocco rank
106th
Gross savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Chad
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 13,038 current LCU per person against 12,945 current LCU per person in Chad, a difference of 93 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 107th and Morocco ranks 106th of 178 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 12,723 current LCU per person | 463.04 current LCU per person | 12,260 current LCU per person | Chad |
| 1980s | 6,345 current LCU per person | 1,851 current LCU per person | 4,494 current LCU per person | Chad |
| 1990s | 5,847 current LCU per person | 2,992 current LCU per person | 2,855 current LCU per person | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per capita, Chad or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 13,038 current LCU per person against 12,945 current LCU per person in Chad as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per capita between Chad and Morocco?
- 93 current LCU per person, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Morocco?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 1994.
- How do Chad and Morocco rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Chad ranks 107th and Morocco ranks 106th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.