Cameroon vs Qatar: Gross savings (current LCU), per capita
Cameroon
172,436 current LCU per person
in 2024
Qatar
185,397 current LCU per person
in 2022
Cameroon rank
46th
Qatar rank
44th
Gross savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Cameroon
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 185,397 current LCU per person against 172,436 current LCU per person in Cameroon, a difference of 12,961 current LCU per person.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Qatar ahead.
Cameroon ranks 46th and Qatar ranks 44th of 178 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 126,625 current LCU per person | 160,390 current LCU per person | 33,765 current LCU per person | Qatar |
| 2020s | 135,005 current LCU per person | 132,788 current LCU per person | 2,217 current LCU per person | Cameroon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per capita, Cameroon or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 185,397 current LCU per person against 172,436 current LCU per person in Cameroon as of 2022.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per capita between Cameroon and Qatar?
- 12,961 current LCU per person, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Qatar?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
- How do Cameroon and Qatar rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Cameroon ranks 46th and Qatar ranks 44th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.