Algeria vs Rwanda: Gross savings (current LCU), per capita
Algeria
304,010 current LCU per person
in 2024
Rwanda
318,240 current LCU per person
in 2024
Algeria rank
35th
Rwanda rank
34th
Gross savings (current LCU), per capita over time
- Algeria
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 318,240 current LCU per person against 304,010 current LCU per person in Algeria, a difference of 14,230 current LCU per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 35th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 178 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 206,911 current LCU per person | 76,250 current LCU per person | 130,661 current LCU per person | Algeria |
| 2020s | 257,030 current LCU per person | 230,237 current LCU per person | 26,793 current LCU per person | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross savings (current lcu), per capita, Algeria or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 318,240 current LCU per person against 304,010 current LCU per person in Algeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross savings (current lcu), per capita between Algeria and Rwanda?
- 14,230 current LCU per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Rwanda?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and Rwanda rank globally for gross savings (current lcu), per capita?
- Algeria ranks 35th and Rwanda ranks 34th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross savings (current LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross savings (current LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.